Sports · Part Five · The Whole Athlete and the Team

52YOUTH

Lesson 52 / 64

The Youth Athlete

The youth athlete is not a small adult; the body is still building the nervous system that the sport will one day demand.

The youth athlete trains on a skeleton that is still lengthening and a nervous system that is still writing its motor maps. Cartilage at the growth plate and the apophysis carries load that adult bone would take, and athletes with high single-sport specialization run 1.81 times the overuse injury risk of low-specialization peers. The Unified Model of Tone reads early specialization as a narrow set of inputs arriving while the range itself is being built.

Overuse risk, high vs low specialization

1.81 times

Weekly sport hours above age in years

Odds ratio 2.07

Growth-related injury clusters at

91.2% of adult height

Youth pitchers past 100 innings a year

3.5 times the risk

Growth plate and apophysis.

The physis is the cartilage disc near the end of a long bone where lengthening happens. An apophysis is the cartilage anchor where a tendon attaches to bone. Both stay cartilage for years and both take load before they finish ossifying.

Why repetition concentrates.

One sport played year round returns the same load to the same cartilage thousands of times and feeds one movement pattern to a motor system assembling its repertoire. Load and input variety fall together.

01What the measurements show

The Numbers on Specialization, Growth and Injury

Eight findings that fix what is actually known about the youth athlete.

1.81 times the overuse risk
Pooled across four studies of athletes 18 and under, high sport specialization carried 1.81 times the overuse injury risk of low specialization, with a 95 percent confidence interval of 1.26 to 2.60, Bell 2018. Moderate specialization sat between the two at 1.39 times low. Risk rises along the gradient rather than switching on at a threshold.
More weekly hours than years of age
Among 1,190 young athletes, those training more weekly hours than their age in years had 2.07 times the odds of a serious overuse injury, Jayanthi 2015. Athletes whose organized sport exceeded free play by more than two to one had 1.87 times the odds. Countable exposure tracks the injury.
Injured athletes were older, not younger
In the same clinic-based comparison, injured athletes averaged 14.1 years against 12.9 years for the uninjured, Jayanthi 2015. Growth rate was 4.8 centimeters per year in both groups. Age tracked injury in the opposite direction to the widely repeated claim that risk peaks around ages 10 to 14.
Burden lowest before the growth spurt
Across 110 individual growth curves in one football academy, injury burden before peak height velocity was 3.2, 3.7 and 5.5 times lower than at the spurt, after it, and in adults, Monasterio 2023. Total days lost climb with maturity rather than falling.
91.2 percent of adult height
Growth-related injuries in an elite academy occurred at a median 91.2 percent of final adult height, while 77.8 percent of muscle injuries arrived after peak height velocity, Monasterio 2021. One class of injury clusters at the spurt, and it is the cartilage class.
15 percent more risk per centimeter
In 378 academy players aged roughly 12 to 15, each additional centimeter per year of growth velocity raised injury odds by 15 percent, Rommers 2021. Motor coordination, jump, flexibility and endurance scores did not mediate that effect at all. The test battery missed what growth was doing.
Conduction proceeds skill
Children aged 6 to 9 already had adult-like central motor conduction times under facilitation, yet trailed adults on reaction time, tapping, ballistic movement, tracking and rapid alternating movement, Heinen 1998. The wiring reaches adult speed years before the control does.
Three names cover 99 percent of it
A 5.5 year cohort of 1,670 schoolchildren logged 1,265 episodes of lower-limb apophysitis, and Sever, Sinding-Larsen-Johansson and Osgood-Schlatter accounted for more than 99 percent of them, Wedderkopp 2026. Extra physical education did not raise the risk. Concentrated sport did.

02A frame still growing

In a Young Athlete the Cartilage Is the Weak Link

The youth athlete is built on a skeleton that is still under construction, and that single fact reshapes how the body should be trained. Long bones lengthen at the physis, the growth plate, while tendons anchor to apophyses, the bony outcrops that stay cartilage longer than the shaft they sit on. While those growth plates and apophyses are still open, the weakest link in a young athlete is often not the muscle or the ligament but the cartilage where bone is still forming.

A force that would sprain an adult ligament can instead lever a growth plate or drag on an apophysis. The traction injuries this produces are common and they are slow. A 5.5 year cohort of 1,670 Danish schoolchildren recorded 1,265 episodes of lower-limb apophysitis, at 3.2 to 7.0 cases per 1,000 leisure-time sport participations Wedderkopp 2026. Median duration ran 3 to 4 weeks, and the range reached 45 weeks.

What the tibial tubercle record shows

The knee version has been counted since the 1980s. Among adolescent athletes seen at one sports clinic, tibial tuberosity pain first appeared at an average age of 13.1 years Kujala 1985. Pain stopped training altogether for an average of 3.2 months and interfered with effective training for 7.3 months.

The same study surveyed 389 students. Among those active in sport at age 13, 21.2 percent had suffered Osgood-Schlatter disease, against 4.5 percent of those who were not active. Sport multiplies the apophyseal exposure close to fivefold at the age when the tubercle is least able to absorb it.

The spine carries the same architecture. Ring apophyses form the insertion of each disc into the vertebral body, and they ossify and fuse during the rapid growth period, with maturation correlating with age at R equals 0.892 Costa 2021. High thoracic and low lumbar levels fused earlier in both sexes. Pars stress injury in this population belongs to Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis.

Loading builds the frame that repetition breaks

None of this argues for less loading. Growing bone adapts to load, and the apophysitis cohort makes the distinction cleanly. Extra physical education did not raise apophysitis risk at all, while children playing soccer, handball, basketball and jump gymnastics carried 2.07 to 2.74 times the risk Wedderkopp 2026. Broad movement was free. Concentrated sport was not.

The lesson is precision rather than caution. Dose and direction have to match a frame that is still becoming what it will be, which is a different task from keeping a child away from effort.

03When injury actually clusters

Youth Injury Does Not Peak Between Ages 10 and 14

The claim that youth sport injury peaks between ages 10 and 14 is repeated constantly and the measurements run the other way. In a comparison of 1,190 young athletes drawn from sports medicine clinics and primary care, the injured group averaged 14.1 years and the uninjured group averaged 12.9 years Jayanthi 2015. Injury tracked upward with age across that whole range.

The longest maturity-banded record says the same thing in days lost. Two decades of injury and height data from one elite football academy produced 110 individual growth curves. Injury burden before peak height velocity was 3.2 times lower than during the spurt, 3.7 times lower than after it, and 5.5 times lower than in the adult squad Monasterio 2023.

What does cluster around the growth spurt

One class of injury genuinely concentrates in those years, and it is the cartilage class. In 509 injuries tracked against final adult height, growth-related injuries occurred at a median 91.2 percent of adult height Monasterio 2021. Muscle injuries were the opposite case, with 77.8 percent of them arriving after peak height velocity at 98.7 percent of adult height.

Tibial tubercle pain beginning at an average of 13.1 years sits inside that same band. So the accurate statement is narrower than the one it replaces. Apophyseal and growth plate injury concentrates around the spurt, while total injury burden keeps climbing afterward as the athlete gets bigger, faster and plays more.

Growth velocity carries risk on its own

Rate of growth is a risk factor in its own right. Investigators measured 378 academy players in the under-13 to under-15 categories twice, then followed them through the season. Each extra centimeter per year of growth velocity raised the odds of injury by 15 percent Rommers 2021. That analysis conditioned on maturity offset, so the effect is growth speed rather than age.

The same study tested whether motor performance explained the effect and found that it did not. Coordination, standing broad jump, countermovement jump, flexibility and intermittent endurance were all measured, and every mediated odds ratio sat close to 1.0 with narrow intervals. A fast growing athlete is at higher risk for reasons the standard physical battery does not register.

Maturity timing matters as much as maturity status. Before peak height velocity, late maturers carried lower burden than on-time maturers. In the adult squad the pattern reversed, and joint and ligament injuries were 4.5 times more burdensome in late maturers than early ones Monasterio 2023. Chronological age is the wrong unit for this athlete. Maturity status is the unit.

04The developing motor system

Movement Is the Input That Builds the Map

The youth years are when the nervous system writes the motor programs that the adult athlete will spend a career refining. Every sprint, cut, throw and landing lays down patterns in the cerebellum, basal ganglia and motor cortex. The variety of those inputs decides how rich the finished map becomes.

Cortical development follows a fixed order that makes this concrete. Thirteen healthy children were each scanned every two years for 8 to 10 years, across an age range of 4 to 21. Higher-order association cortices matured only after the sensory and visual cortices whose functions they integrate Gogtay 2004. The layer that combines signals is assembled last, on top of the layers feeding it.

Conduction is ready before control is

The cable matures well ahead of the skill. Children aged 6 to 9 already had central motor conduction times equal to adults under facilitation, along with adult-like silent periods Heinen 1998. On every motor task measured, including reaction time, tapping, ballistic movement, tracking and rapid alternating movement, the same children performed below the adults.

What is still changing is the balance between excitation and inhibition. Navigated stimulation across four age bands from 6 years to adulthood found resting motor threshold falling with age and settling in adolescence, while the cortical silent period shortened Säisänen 2018. Manual dexterity correlated negatively with resting motor threshold. Strong corticospinal inhibition in childhood loosened as control improved.

A young athlete is therefore not a weaker copy of an adult one. The signal arrives on time and the system that decides what to do with it is unfinished. How that drive is measured once it is finished belongs to Cortical Drive and Force.

Why variety is the training variable

A child who runs, climbs, swims and plays several sports feeds the developing brain a wider vocabulary of coordination than one who repeats a single skill year round. Diverse loading builds proprioception and reaction time that transfer between sports. Monotony narrows the map and returns the same load to the same tissue.

The order that follows is a broad, resilient nervous system first and sport specific polish second. Specialization has a place in that sequence, and it is the later one.

Free play is the measurable version of that variety, and it shows up in the injury data. Young athletes whose organized sport hours exceeded their free play by more than two to one had 1.87 times the odds of a serious overuse injury Jayanthi 2015. The receptors feeding that map are the subject of Proprioception and Joint Position Sense, and the speed of the answer they support belongs to Reaction Time and Motor Control.

05Single-sport specialization

Early Specialization Raises Overuse Injury Risk on a Gradient

Specialization carries measurable overuse injury risk for the youth athlete, and the risk scales with the degree of it. A review and meta-analysis restricted to athletes 18 and under pooled four studies and found highly specialized athletes at 1.81 times the overuse risk of low-specialization athletes Bell 2018. Moderate specialization sat at 1.39 times low, and high sat at 1.18 times moderate.

The clinic-based comparison behind much of that literature enrolled 1,214 athletes aged 7 to 18 and analyzed 1,190. After adjusting for age and for weekly hours in sport, specialized training remained an independent risk for injury at an odds ratio of 1.27 and for serious overuse injury at 1.36 Jayanthi 2015. Volume and specialization are separate exposures.

The longitudinal test agreed

Following the same athletes for three years reproduced the effect. Of 579 participants with baseline and follow-up surveys, mean age 14.1 years, 73 percent were injured over the study period and 29 percent of those injuries were reinjuries Jayanthi 2020. More specialized athletes were more likely to be injured and more likely to sustain an overuse injury.

That cohort was 53 percent female, and female athletes were at higher risk for all injuries and for overuse injuries after adjustment. Sex differences in injury pattern belong to The Female Athlete.

Why repetition finds the same tissue

When a young athlete trains one sport through every season, the same growth plates, apophyses and tendons absorb the same load thousands of times while the rest of the body goes quiet. Pars stress injury at L5 in gymnasts and divers, medial elbow stress in young pitchers and traction apophysitis at the knee and heel are not bad luck. They are the predictable signature of repetition on a growing frame.

Valgus load at the immature elbow is the best documented case, and The Elbow carries it in full. The fix is structured variety rather than less effort, and it is a training design question. Three things are countable: weekly hours against the athlete's age in years, organized sport against free play, and how many months a year the single sport runs. That third number is the one an off season exists to protect.

06Volume and the young arm

Counted Volume Is the Exposure a Youth Program Can Actually Control

Youth pitching gives the clearest long-run measurement of volume in any junior sport. Investigators enrolled 481 pitchers aged 9 to 14 and interviewed them annually for a decade, counting elbow surgery, shoulder surgery or retirement from throwing injury as the endpoint Fleisig 2011. The cumulative incidence was 5.0 percent.

One exposure separated the injured from the rest. Pitchers who threw more than 100 innings in a single calendar year were 3.5 times more likely to be injured, with a confidence interval running from 1.16 to 10.44. Throwing curveballs before age 13 did not show the risk the coaching folklore assumed. Playing catcher trended toward more injury without reaching significance.

Ten years later, the same arm

A second cohort followed 261 pitchers with a mean age of 14.2 years into their highest level of play Shanley 2023. Overall arm injury incidence reached 25.6 per 100 athletes, and 5.4 per 100 needed surgery. Players who continued beyond high school were 4.3 times more likely to have surgery than those who stopped there.

Exposure accumulates across seasons rather than resetting each spring. The workload arithmetic that tries to formalize this, along with the statistical critiques that have reshaped it, belongs to Injury Prevention and Load Management.

The head is the highest-stakes exposure

Head injury is the most consequential risk in youth sport, and the developing brain is assessed on pediatric criteria rather than adult ones. Children were long held to a separate and longer recovery clock, and the current consensus sets one threshold for persisting symptoms at more than four weeks at every age. Recovery from concussion is a neurological process, and it is managed by stages, not by the calendar alone.

A graded return to play protocol moves an athlete from rest, to light aerobic work, to sport specific drills, to non contact training, to full contact. Each stage is cleared without symptoms before the next one begins. The systems worth measuring are the systems an impact disrupts: balance, eye movements and reaction time.

Those readings tell a clinician the brain has returned rather than that the days have passed. The current consensus definition, the assessment tools and the pediatric protocols behind every sentence in this subsection are carried in full by Concussion.

07Specialization and elite success

Athletes Who Reach the Top Mostly Specialized Later

Early specialization does not buy the elite outcome it is sold for. A systematic review screened 8,756 articles and kept 29 studies of professional, Olympic and other elite athletes McLellan 2022. Of the nine that reported performance, seven found better outcomes in athletes who specialized later. The two exceptions were marathon runners and soccer players.

Every one of the eight articles that examined injury risk in that group found lower risk with delayed specialization. Career longevity was the least settled question, with five of nine studies finding no association either way. Most of this evidence is retrospective and survey-based, and 17 of the 29 studies were surveys. The direction is consistent across sports.

Building for decades

The youth athlete is best developed as a nervous system on a thirty year arc rather than a result to be harvested this season. Performance rests on the central integrative state the athlete brings to each session: autonomic balance, recovery capacity and central readiness. That is the resting state from which adaptation begins.

Training is an input meeting that state. The Unified Model of Tone reads a dysregulated system as one whose available range has narrowed, which is why the same block that builds one athlete breaks another. The instruments already exist for it. Heart Rate Variability carries the variability readout and Sleep and the Athlete carries the nightly reorganization that restores it.

Sport medicine, athletic trainers, strength coaches and the chiropractic neurologist work best as one team around this athlete, each watching a different layer of the same growing system. How that co-management is structured belongs to Working With the Performance Team.

The whole task fits in one line: train the frame the body is becoming, feed the brain the variety it needs, and guard the head and the autonomic system that everything else rests on.

The athletes who last are the ones whose nervous systems were built broad before they were built narrow. No one can rush a growth plate or shortcut a motor map. A young athlete can be fed the variety that makes both stronger, and the athlete who can do many things becomes the athlete who can do one thing exceptionally well.

08Five figures removed

Five Numbers Left This Page Because They Could Not Be Traced

This page previously stated that the highest youth injury rate falls between ages 10 and 14. No source supports it, and the maturity-banded evidence above runs the other way, so it is gone. Four other figures went with it, and none could be traced to a published source. Epiphyseal fractures at roughly 3 percent of football injuries in this group. Sprains and strains at about 30 percent of cases. The vertebral ring apophysis finishing its fusion close to age 18. Two thirds of young athletes with discogenic back pain presenting with pain alone.

The ring apophysis claim is replaced rather than deleted. Ossification and fusion of those apophyses run through the rapid growth period and correlate with age at R equals 0.892, with the sequence differing by spinal level and by sex Costa 2021. Two head injury claims also went, both asserted without a figure. A third was updated. The page said a young brain is more vulnerable to the metabolic cascade after impact and generally takes longer to recover than an adult one. The current consensus sets a single persisting-symptom threshold at every age. The definitions and the pediatric protocols sit on Concussion.

One more removal sits under the specialization material, where a gold pull-quote carried Dr. Jason Dulberg's name. Nothing he said or wrote stands behind those words, so they are struck. The claim inside them survives as the page's own: build broad before narrow.

09The model's claim

A Growing Athlete Is Building the Processor That Will Read Every Later Input

Everything counted above was counted on children while they were still changing. The pooled overuse risk ratio, the burden figures across maturity bands and the 15 percent odds increase per centimeter of growth are one layer. So are the conduction times in six to nine year olds and the innings threshold in youth pitchers. All of it belongs to the investigators named beside it.

The Unified Model of Tone lays one reading across that set. The model describes the nervous system as a processor with a fixed capacity, taking in everything the body and the world hand it and working to integrate all of it in real time. In a young athlete that processor is being assembled out of the inputs themselves, so the training diet is construction material as well as load.

Deficient tone is the failure at that end: a reduced capacity to organize, an inability to sustain functional relationships, and weak responsiveness. That is a different failure from the overloaded adult, and it explains why the standard physical battery came up empty in the growth velocity analysis Rommers 2021. Coordination scores, jump heights and endurance are quantities. Organization is what growth was perturbing.

The prediction this page makes

Take one academy squad through the maturation window and record four readings in the same athletes every eight weeks. Joint position sense error in degrees. Reaction time variability, taken as the spread rather than the mean. RMSSD from a morning recording. Time to return to baseline after a standardized load test.

Alongside those, record percentage of predicted adult height and the breadth of movement exposure, which is hours in sports other than the primary one and the ratio of organized sport to free play. The model predicts that the four readouts share one underlying factor within each athlete rather than varying independently, and that the growth spurt registers as a dip across the set, with compensation deciding which readout dips first.

It further predicts that athletes with broader movement exposure show a narrower spread across those readings at the same maturity band. This is a claim about how youth performance is organized rather than a claim about what any treatment does.

If joint position sense error, reaction time variability, RMSSD and return-to-baseline time after a load test move together within the same young athletes across the maturation window, the unification claim is confirmed.

10The tone reading

The Youth Athlete as a System Still Assembling Itself

Three signatures of tone carry this page, and each one is already being measured in youth sport.

Input quality

Varied movement is the material the motor map is built from. Athletes whose organized hours exceeded free play by more than two to one carried 1.87 times the overuse odds.

Constraint

Deficient tone is too little organization rather than too much. Corticospinal inhibition falls through childhood while dexterity rises, so the young system is still learning what to hold quiet.

Time course

Maturation sets the clock. Growth-related injuries cluster at 91.2 percent of adult height, and burden climbs 5.5-fold from before the spurt to the adult squad.

The other foundations run through the same athlete. Load is what the physis absorbs while it is still cartilage, and weekly hours above the athlete's age in years is its countable form. Coupling is the cross-body timing that transfers between sports and gets little practice when one skill is repeated alone. Gain is how strongly a growing system answers an input, and the shortening cortical silent period is that setting being tuned. Prediction is the feedforward model a child assembles from every landing. Set-point is what a regulator defends while the body it regulates changes size every season. Oscillation is the sleep and cardiac rhythm that reorganizes the system between sessions. The framework behind all of it is the Unified Model of Tone.

11Where this sits

How This Page Relates to the Rest of the Library

Seven places the youth athlete argument continues, each with the claim that earns the link.

The Elbow

Carries valgus load, the ulnar collateral ligament and the throwing kinetics this page reduces to volume.

Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis

The pars stress injury that repetition finds in young gymnasts, divers and throwers.

Injury Prevention and Load Management

Holds the acute to chronic workload arithmetic and the statistical critiques that reshaped it.

Concussion

The current consensus definition, the assessment tools and the pediatric return protocols.

The Female Athlete

Why the female athletes in these same cohorts carried higher injury odds, and what cycle physiology adds.

Body Composition

Low energy availability in a growing athlete, and why a composition number reports quantity rather than regulation.

The Young Athlete

The pediatric view of the same developing system, before organized sport sets the training calendar.

12Questions athletes ask

Questions Athletes Ask

Is early single-sport specialization risky for a young athlete?

The risk is real and it scales with the degree of specialization. Pooled across four studies of athletes 18 and under, highly specialized athletes carried 1.81 times the overuse injury risk of low-specialization peers, with moderate specialization at 1.39 times low. In a clinic comparison of 1,190 young athletes, specialized training stayed an independent risk after adjusting for age and weekly hours. Repetition returns the same load to the same growth plates while feeding one movement pattern to a nervous system still assembling its repertoire.

At what age is a youth athlete most likely to get hurt?

Total injury risk rises with age and maturity rather than peaking in the early teens. Injured young athletes in one clinic cohort averaged 14.1 years against 12.9 years for the uninjured. Across 110 growth curves in an elite academy, injury burden before peak height velocity ran 3.2 times lower than during the spurt and 5.5 times lower than in adults. What does cluster around the spurt is cartilage injury, with growth-related injuries occurring at a median 91.2 percent of adult height.

What are growth plates and apophyses, and why do they get injured in sport?

The physis is the cartilage disc near the end of a long bone where lengthening happens. An apophysis is the cartilage anchor where a tendon attaches to bone. Both carry load for years before they finish ossifying, which makes cartilage the weak link in a young athlete rather than muscle or ligament. In a 5.5 year cohort of 1,670 children, Sever, Sinding-Larsen-Johansson and Osgood-Schlatter disease accounted for more than 99 percent of lower-limb apophysitis, at a median duration of 3 to 4 weeks.

How does training variety improve a young athlete's development?

Movement is the input the motor map is built from. Every sprint, cut, throw and landing lays down patterns in the cerebellum, basal ganglia and motor cortex, and the variety of those inputs decides how rich the finished map becomes. Cortical development runs in a fixed order, with the association cortices that integrate signals maturing after the sensory areas that supply them. A child who runs, climbs, swims and plays several sports feeds that assembly a wider vocabulary of coordination than one repeating a single skill.

How much sport is too much for a young athlete?

Three exposures are countable and each carries a number. Athletes training more weekly hours than their age in years had 2.07 times the odds of a serious overuse injury. Those whose organized sport exceeded free play by more than two to one had 1.87 times the odds. Youth pitchers throwing more than 100 innings in a calendar year were 3.5 times more likely to be injured across ten years of follow-up. Volume and specialization are separate exposures, and both are measurable.

What should we expect from concussion recovery in a young athlete?

Recovery is a neurological process and it is managed by stages rather than by the calendar. A graded return moves an athlete from rest through light aerobic work, sport-specific drills, non-contact training and then full contact, advancing only when each stage clears. Children and adolescents are assessed on pediatric criteria rather than adult ones. The systems worth measuring are the ones an impact disrupts: balance, eye movements and reaction time. Those readings show the brain has returned rather than that the days have passed.

What does the Unified Model of Tone say about the youth athlete?

The model describes the nervous system as a processor with a fixed capacity, integrating everything the body and the world hand it in real time. In a young athlete that processor is being assembled out of the inputs themselves, so training is construction material as well as load. Early specialization narrows the inputs during the years when the range is being built. The prediction is that joint position sense error, reaction time variability, RMSSD and return-to-baseline time move together across the maturation window.

13The sources

References

1
Jayanthi NA, LaBella CR, Fischer D, Pasulka J, Dugas LR. Sports-specialized intensive training and the risk of injury in young athletes: a clinical case-control study. Am J Sports Med. 2015. PMID 25646361
2
Jayanthi N, Kleithermes S, Dugas L, Pasulka J, Iqbal S, LaBella C. Risk of Injuries Associated With Sport Specialization and Intense Training Patterns in Young Athletes: A Longitudinal Clinical Case-Control Study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020. PMID 32637428
3
Bell DR, Post EG, Biese K, Bay C, Valovich McLeod T. Sport Specialization and Risk of Overuse Injuries: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2018. PMID 30135085
4
McLellan M, Allahabadi S, Pandya NK. Youth Sports Specialization and Its Effect on Professional, Elite, and Olympic Athlete Performance, Career Longevity, and Injury Rates: A Systematic Review. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022. PMID 36353394
5
Monasterio X, Gil SM, Bidaurrazaga-Letona I, Lekue JA, Santisteban JM, Diaz-Beitia G, Lee DJ, Zumeta-Olaskoaga L, Martin-Garetxana I, Bikandi E, Larruskain J. The burden of injuries according to maturity status and timing: A two-decade study with 110 growth curves in an elite football academy. Eur J Sport Sci. 2023. PMID 34767492
6
Monasterio X, Gil SM, Bidaurrazaga-Letona I, Lekue JA, Santisteban J, Diaz-Beitia G, Martin-Garetxana I, Bikandi E, Larruskain J. Injuries according to the percentage of adult height in an elite soccer academy. J Sci Med Sport. 2021. PMID 32839106
7
Rommers N, Rössler R, Shrier I, Lenoir M, Witvrouw E, D'Hondt E, Verhagen E. Motor performance is not related to injury risk in growing elite-level male youth football players. A causal inference approach to injury risk assessment. J Sci Med Sport. 2021. PMID 33752967
8
Fleisig GS, Andrews JR, Cutter GR, Weber A, Loftice J, McMichael C, Hassell N, Lyman S. Risk of serious injury for young baseball pitchers: a 10-year prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2011. PMID 21098816
9
Shanley E, Thigpen CA, Boes N, Bailey L, Arnold A, Bullock G, Kissenberth MJ. Arm injury in youth baseball players: a 10-year cohort study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023. PMID 36828286
10
Wedderkopp N, Wang C, Steele R, Hebert J, Rexen C, Jespersen E, Junge T, Thomsen T, Jensen FM, Shrier I. Incidence of and Risk Factors for Lower Extremity Apophysitis in Children and Adolescents. Sports Med. 2026. PMID 41182572
11
Kujala UM, Kvist M, Heinonen O. Osgood-Schlatter's disease in adolescent athletes. Retrospective study of incidence and duration. Am J Sports Med. 1985. PMID 4025675
12
Gogtay N, Giedd JN, Lusk L, Hayashi KM, Greenstein D, Vaituzis AC, Nugent TF, Herman DH, Clasen LS, Toga AW, Rapoport JL, Thompson PM. Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004. PMID 15148381
13
Heinen F, Fietzek UM, Berweck S, Hufschmidt A, Deuschl G, Korinthenberg R. Fast corticospinal system and motor performance in children: conduction proceeds skill. Pediatr Neurol. 1998. PMID 9806140
14
Säisänen L, Julkunen P, Lakka T, Lindi V, Könönen M, Määttä S. Development of corticospinal motor excitability and cortical silent period from mid-childhood to adulthood, a navigated TMS study. Neurophysiol Clin. 2018. PMID 29274767
15
Costa L, de Reuver S, Kan L, Seevinck P, Kruyt MC, Schlosser TPC, Castelein RM. Ossification and Fusion of the Vertebral Ring Apophysis as an Important Part of Spinal Maturation. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID 34362001

15 primary sources, each linked to its record. Figures quoted on this page were checked against the published abstract.

Related evidence

← All 64 lessons