The Nervous System · Part One · How It Is Built and Fueled

03Signaling

Lesson 03 / 61

The Synapse: What Crosses the Cleft, and What Decides Whether Anything Does

Where the signal is handed over, and where the handover can be refused.

The synapse is the junction where one neuron hands its signal to the next. A presynaptic terminal releases packets of transmitter into a narrow cleft, and receptors on the far side convert them back into current. The handover is a gamble. One arriving spike releases nothing at some terminals and several packets at others. The Unified Model of Tone reads release probability as the setting the synapse itself holds.

Synaptic delay

150 microseconds, rat cerebellar bouton

Docked vesicles

About 10 per active zone

Release probability

0.09 to 0.54 on one axon

Unitary excitatory potential

1.3 mV mean, 0 to 73 percent failures

The postsynaptic potential

The voltage change a bound transmitter produces in the receiving cell. It carries one of two signs. An excitatory postsynaptic potential moves the membrane toward threshold and an inhibitory one moves it away. Neither is a spike. Both spread over the cell body as a decremental wave called electrotonus, weakening as it travels, which is why a cell must collect many of them before it answers.

Short-term plasticity

The change in a synapse's strength produced by its own recent activity, lasting seconds at most. Facilitation raises the response to a second spike and depression lowers it. Which one a terminal shows follows from how much of its docked stock the first spike spent. In the Unified Model of Tone, that filter setting is what a synapse holds between one message and the next.

01The handover

The chemical synapse converts an electrical signal into a chemical one and back

A chemical synapse is built from three parts. The presynaptic terminal bouton stores and releases transmitter, the cleft separates the two cells, and the postsynaptic membrane carries the receptors that read what arrives. Exocytosis pushes the message into chemistry, and the receptors pull it back into current.

What crosses is a courier. Glutamate and GABA carry most of the fast traffic in the mammalian brain, and peptides released alongside them adjust the terms of the exchange. Whatever the molecule, the receiving cell answers in voltage, and that voltage fades as it spreads toward the trigger zone.

The handover costs time. At rat cerebellar synapses recorded at physiological temperature, postsynaptic responses begin 150 microseconds after the presynaptic action potential starts Sabatini 1996. Calcium-driven vesicle fusion lags calcium influx by 60 microseconds, and rapid calcium channel kinetics let calcium enter during the upstroke of the spike itself.

Delay is the price of a junction that can be adjusted

Those microseconds buy a chemical step, and the chemical step is what makes the junction adjustable. At a glutamatergic synapse the step runs in order. Transmitter binding opens the AMPA-kainate channel, sodium enters, and the local depolarization expels the magnesium plug from the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor waiting beside it. Sodium and calcium then flow through the NMDA channel, and that calcium works as a second messenger rather than as charge alone.

The NMDA receptor therefore opens only when sender and receiver agree, which is coincidence detection at the molecular level. The measured width of the cleft and the receptor families that read what crosses it belong to The Neurotransmitters. The running balance between glutamate and GABA belongs to GABA, Glutamate and the Balance.

One synapse rarely decides anything alone. A neuron needs roughly 15 millivolts of depolarization from rest before it fires, and a single excitatory event delivers a fraction of that. Events arriving in quick succession stack by temporal summation, events arriving on separate dendrites add by spatial summation, and the axon hillock reads the total against threshold. That arithmetic is the subject of The Neuron and the Central Integrative State.

02Findings

What the research shows

Measured values for release timing, vesicle stock, transmission odds, and spinal gating.

150 microseconds
Interval from the start of the presynaptic action potential to the postsynaptic response at rat cerebellar synapses at physiological temperature Sabatini 1996. Vesicle fusion lags calcium influx by 60 microseconds, so the chemical step costs a fraction of a millisecond and buys everything the junction can adjust.
More than 60
Calcium channels that must open for each vesicle released at the rat calyx of Held Borst 1996. Release is a calcium-gated gamble rather than a relay, which is why the presynaptic side can carry a setting the arriving spike knows nothing about.
About 10
Docked vesicles per active zone in reconstructed rodent hippocampal excitatory synapses, out of about 200 in the whole bouton Schikorski 1997. The stock available on the first spike is countable, and it sets the ceiling on what one message can carry.
7,000
Glutamate molecules estimated in one vesicle at the rat calyx of Held at postnatal days 12 to 16 Budisantoso 2013. A single vesicle still fails to saturate the receptors facing it, so the postsynaptic reply keeps counting packets rather than reading a threshold.
0.09 to 0.54
Range of release probability across terminals arising from one axon on cultured hippocampal neurons Rosenmund 1993. One cell speaks to its targets with different confidence at each, which makes release probability a property of the junction and not of the sender.
0 to 73 percent
Failure rate of single presynaptic spikes to evoke any response between layer 5 pyramidal pairs in developing rat neocortex, mean 14 percent Markram 1997. Unitary potentials spanned 0.15 to 5.5 millivolts, a 20-fold efficacy range traced mainly to release probability.
50 to 100 spikes per second
Tonic discharge of internal pallidal and nigral output neurons in monkeys, with only 6 percent classified as pausers Elias 2007. Movement is released by interrupting a brake that never stops running, not by adding excitation to a quiet circuit.
28.4 percent versus 15.3 percent
H-reflex attenuation after an L5 to S1 side-posture thrust against side-posture positioning alone in asymptomatic adults Dishman 2005. The thrust and the position both reach the gate, and the thrust moves it further.

03Packets, not a stream

Transmitter leaves the terminal in packets of fixed size, and the count varies

Release at a synapse is quantal. Fatt and Katz recorded spontaneous subthreshold activity at motor nerve endings in 1952 Fatt 1952. Two years later del Castillo and Katz showed that the evoked end plate potential is assembled from those same units del Castillo 1954. The unit is a vesicle, and the evoked response is a count of them.

The stock behind each count is small. Three-dimensional reconstructions of excitatory synapses in rodent hippocampus and in culture put about 10 docked vesicles at each active zone and about 200 vesicles in the whole bouton Schikorski 1997. Average active zone area came in near 0.04 square micrometers, and most boutons carry a single zone.

Each packet is crowded in molecules and short in reach. Simulation fitted to receptor mapping at the rat calyx of Held between postnatal days 12 and 16 put about 7,000 glutamate molecules in one vesicle Budisantoso 2013. A single vesicle does not saturate the receptors facing it, so a second packet still adds to the reply.

A spike does not guarantee a packet

Calcium is the trigger, and it is not a generous one. At the rat calyx of Held, comparing quantal content with the presynaptic calcium current showed that more than 60 calcium channels open for each vesicle released Borst 1996. Dialyzing the terminal with 1 millimolar EGTA already cut phasic release, which places the calcium sensor some distance from the channel pore.

That sensor has a name and a measured sensitivity. A point mutation in synaptotagmin I halving calcium affinity, knocked into the mouse gene, halved the calcium sensitivity of release Fernandez-Chacon 2001. Spontaneous release and the size of the readily releasable pool did not move. Evoked release carries its own adjustable setting, separate from the stock it draws on.

04Release probability

Release probability differs between terminals fed by the same axon

Release probability is the chance that one arriving spike releases a packet at one release site. It is not a constant of the nervous system. Measured with an irreversible open channel blocker at excitatory synapses on cultured hippocampal neurons, it ranged from 0.09 to 0.54 across terminals arising from a single axon Rosenmund 1993. Most sat at the low end.

Paired recordings show what that spread costs. Between thick tufted layer 5 pyramidal neurons in developing rat neocortex, unitary excitatory potentials averaged 1.3 millivolts and ranged from 0.15 to 5.5 millivolts Markram 1997. Single presynaptic spikes failed to evoke any response between 0 and 73 percent of the time, with a mean failure rate of 14 percent.

Anatomy did not account for the spread. Each connection used four to eight contacts, averaging 5.5, and amplitude correlated only weakly with contact number or distance from the soma. The 20-fold range in efficacy between connections was attributed mainly to differences in transmitter release probability at the projecting cell.

The stock behind a terminal sets its odds

Release probability is not free-floating. Hypertonic solution applied to hippocampal synapses empties a defined pool, and evoked release and hypertonic release change together as that pool changes, which places release probability downstream of readily releasable pool size Rosenmund 1996. A terminal holding more vesicles docked speaks with more confidence.

This is a state, and it is held on the sending side. Two axons carrying identical spike trains deliver different messages when their terminals hold different pools. Nothing in the spike carries that information, because the spike is all or none. The difference belongs to the junction.

05History sets the filter

A synapse answers a train of spikes according to what it just finished doing

A synapse rewrites its own strength on the strength of its recent work, over seconds. Facilitation raises the second response and depression lowers it. Which one a terminal shows follows from its release probability, because a bouton that spends its docked stock on the first spike has little left for the second. This is short-term plasticity.

That setting decides which code survives the crossing. Paired recordings from neocortical pyramidal neurons combined with theory showed that the rate of synaptic depression follows release probability Tsodyks 1997. Where depression is slow, the postsynaptic cell reports presynaptic firing rate. Where depression is fast, it reports temporal coherence instead.

Depression also works as automatic gain control. Cortical neurons receive afferents firing from under 1 hertz to over 200 hertz. Modeling built on experimental measurements showed that short-term depression lets equal percentage rate changes on fast and slow afferents produce equal postsynaptic responses Abbott 1997. The adjustment is input-specific, so a quiet afferent is not buried by a loud neighbor.

The filter setting is visible in the electron microscope

Serial reconstruction in mouse brain found olfactory cortical synapses about 2.5 times larger than their hippocampal counterparts Schikorski 1999. Layer Ia synapses held fewer vesicles than layer Ib but matched the smaller hippocampal synapses in docked vesicle number. Layer Ia facilitates and layer Ib does not.

Two populations in one cortical region therefore filter their inputs in opposite directions, and the difference is structural. A synapse is a tuned device rather than a wire, and its tuning is readable in the count of vesicles waiting at the membrane.

The Unified Model of Tone makes its claim here, in the synapse's own units. Tone at a chemical synapse is release probability together with the docked stock standing behind it. That pair decides whether an arriving train is amplified, passed through, or filtered out before the next cell hears anything.

A synapse holding that pair inside its working range can facilitate when input is sparse and depress when input is heavy, which is what keeps a circuit legible across a 200-fold range of firing rates. A synapse pinned high empties on the first spike and reports nothing after it. A synapse pinned low drops the message. Both are illness at the scale of a junction, because a circuit that cannot move its filter cannot answer a body that keeps changing.

06Brakes on brakes

Disinhibition drives circuits by interrupting a brake that never stops running

Inhibition at a synapse is an active sculpting force, and disinhibition is its sharpest use. Spontaneously active neurons are held quiet by GABAergic cells. Silence those cells with still others of their kind and the target is released. A brake placed on a brake produces excitation with no excitatory transmitter anywhere in the chain.

The basal ganglia run on that arrangement. Output neurons of the internal globus pallidus and substantia nigra pars reticulata discharge tonically at 50 to 100 spikes per second in monkeys Elias 2007. Only 6 percent of those output cells were classified as pausers, against 56 percent of external pallidal cells. The brake on movement is close to permanently on.

Lifting it is how movement starts. The basal ganglia arouse executive motor centers through that disinhibitory mechanism, using their own output as a template for which motor elements to engage Chevalier 1990. The reticular system applies the same double-negative logic to motor control. The circuit is followed further in The Basal Ganglia.

Presynaptic inhibition edits a message before it is sent

The cleft can also be governed from upstream, on the sending side. GABAergic interneurons form axo-axonic synapses on the terminal arborizations of sensory fibers in the spinal cord, producing primary afferent depolarization and cutting transmitter release Rudomin 1999. Intraspinal sensory terminals are dynamic systems whose traffic central mechanisms can address to selected targets.

The editing runs branch by branch. Cable modeling with experimental verification put primary afferent depolarization near 10 millivolts on some distal branches of mammalian group I collaterals Lamotte d'Incamps 1999. The electrotonic structure of those collaterals kept it from spreading through the whole arbor. One fiber can be silenced at one target and heard clearly at another.

Descending pathways from the brain reach these same terminals, so what a segment sends upward is already an edited report. A change in what a person feels can come from a brake lifting as readily as from a stimulus growing. The receptor feeding these gated terminals is the subject of Muscle Spindles and Proprioception.

07Electrical junctions

Electrical synapses trade the ability to be modulated for the ability to synchronize

Not every synapse uses a chemical courier. Furshpan and Potter described direct electrical transmission at the giant motor synapses of the crayfish in 1959 Furshpan 1959. Electrical synapses are gap junctions, also called nexuses, between the dendrites or somas of contiguous neurons, built from channels roughly 1.5 nanometers wide.

Cytoplasm runs continuous through those channels, so no transmitter is involved and there is no synaptic delay. Voltage changes pass straight from one cell into the next. Coupling that tight cannot be weighted or gated, so an electrical synapse cannot learn. Its work is making neighbors fire together.

In mammalian cortex the wiring is selective. Paired recordings found frequent electrical coupling among fast-spiking GABAergic interneurons, none among pyramidal neurons, and none between fast-spiking cells and other cortical types Galarreta 1999. Coupling drove the linked interneurons toward synchronous spiking.

One protein carries the synchrony

Mice carrying a reporter in place of connexin 36 lost almost all electrical synapses between cortical interneurons, and the rhythmic inhibitory activity that survived was weaker and more spatially restricted Deans 2001. A single gap junction protein sets how far a cortical rhythm can spread through the tissue.

The reach is short and strictly local. In rat somatosensory cortex layer 4, coupling probability and coupling coefficient both fall to zero beyond 200 micrometers of intersomatic distance, and each interneuron holds measurable coupling with 20 to 50 others Amitai 2002. The two synaptic designs split the labor between fidelity in timing and the capacity to compute.

08Spinal input at the gate

An adjustment reaches this machinery as a volley into a gate that is already set

The gate on spinal afferent terminals moves with posture alone. Going from lying supine to standing lowered the soleus H-reflex in 10 adults from 68.7 to 54.8 percent of the maximal motor response. The conditioned reflex fell with it, from 30.7 to 17.5 percent Mynark 1997. The protocol reads presynaptic inhibition of the Ia pathway indirectly, and both measures fell on standing.

The same input can reverse its sign with the task. Stimulating a cutaneous nerve in the opposite foot facilitated the soleus H-reflex during standing and suppressed it during the early stance phase of walking Suzuki 2014. Background soleus activity was matched between the two conditions. Nothing about the stimulus changed, and the reply inverted.

What the manipulation studies measure

Spinal manipulation is measured against this same pathway. A side-posture thrust at L5 to S1 attenuated the reflex by 28.4 percent, against 15.3 percent for side-posture positioning alone Dishman 2005. Assisted manipulation attenuated it 18.2 percent against 9.5 percent unassisted, and joint preload without thrust produced 8.5 and 7.5 percent.

The timing is tight. Across 66 asymptomatic adults and 45 patients with subacute low back pain, inhibition was greatest 10 seconds after the thrust, and the effect ran similar in both groups Dishman 2018. A thrust moves a gate setting on the timescale of neural signaling rather than tissue repair.

Null results belong in the same account. In 75 people with previous knee injury and current quadriceps inhibition, lumbopelvic manipulation and patellar mobilization changed neither the H-reflex nor presynaptic nor postsynaptic excitability across 90 minutes Grindstaff 2014. In this model that input reached a gate the knee injury already held down, and found nothing left to move.

This is the ground the practice stands on. We are the practice organized around the nervous system, and an adjustment is a mechanical event whose first measurable consequence is a change in presynaptic gating. The model stakes something specific on that reading. Presynaptic inhibition at afferent terminals moving with reflex gain and with the postural state that sets both is what confirms this account.

Instrument values, outcome evidence, and the history of these measures sit on the neurophysiology page. The receptor densities behind spinal afferent traffic sit on input quality.

A spike always arrives on time, and whether anything gets said is a separate question.

09Tone

How this system expresses tone

Read one junction closely and the foundations of tone are already written in its numbers.

Gain

Short-term depression lets equal percentage rate changes produce equal replies across afferents firing from under 1 hertz to over 200 hertz.

Input quality

Sensory terminals are edited before they speak. Primary afferent depolarization near 10 millivolts silences some distal branches of one fiber and spares others.

Coupling

Electrical junctions bind inhibitory cells into one sheet. Each cortical interneuron couples measurably to 20 to 50 others within 200 micrometers.

The rest of tone is legible at the same terminal. Oscillation: whether a burst is passed as a firing rate or as a coincidence depends on how fast that synapse depresses. Prediction: layer Ia olfactory synapses facilitate and layer Ib synapses do not, so each population is already committed to the input pattern it expects. Load: about 200 vesicles per bouton and about 10 docked at the zone put a hard ceiling on what a single message can spend. Constraint: more than 60 calcium channels must open per vesicle released, so calcium entry limits what the terminal is able to say. Set point: standing lowered the soleus reflex from 68.7 to 54.8 percent of maximum, a gate reset by posture with no change in the afferent. Time course: fusion lags calcium by 60 microseconds, facilitation and depression run over seconds, and a manipulated gate reads deepest at 10 seconds.

10Across the library

How this page relates to the rest of the library

Where this junction is read across the rest of the library.

The neurotransmitters

The measured width of the cleft and the receptor families waiting on the far side, which decide what a released packet means once it arrives.

GABA, glutamate and the balance

The ratio the two dominant transmitters hold, and why a circuit's capability follows the proportion between them rather than the level of either.

The neuron and the central integrative state

How a cell sums the thousands of small events described here into one verdict, and why roughly 15 millivolts separates silence from a spike.

Muscle spindles and proprioception

The receptor whose terminals carry the axo-axonic synapses gated here, and the source of most of the afferent traffic a spinal segment generates.

The basal ganglia

The circuit built on brakes released rather than accelerators pressed, where output neurons run at 50 to 100 spikes per second until something pauses them.

Neurophysiology as a measurable state

What an H-reflex or an evoked potential reports at the bedside, what a given value means, and the outcome evidence behind those instruments.

11Frequently asked

Questions about this topic

What is a synapse?

A synapse is the junction where one neuron passes its signal to another cell. At a chemical synapse a presynaptic terminal releases packets of transmitter into a narrow cleft, and receptors on the postsynaptic membrane convert those packets back into current. The reply either depolarizes the target toward firing or hyperpolarizes it away. At an electrical synapse, gap junction channels join the two cytoplasms directly, so current passes with no transmitter and no delay. Both types appear throughout the mammalian nervous system, and the chemical form is far more common.

How fast is synaptic transmission?

Chemical transmission is fast but not instant. At rat cerebellar synapses recorded at physiological temperature, the postsynaptic response begins 150 microseconds after the presynaptic action potential starts, and vesicle fusion lags calcium influx by 60 microseconds. Rapid calcium channel kinetics allow calcium to enter during the upstroke of the spike rather than only during repolarization. Electrical synapses have no such delay, because current flows directly between the coupled cells. That difference in timing is what separates their two jobs in the nervous system.

What is release probability?

Release probability is the chance that one arriving spike causes a vesicle to fuse at one release site. It is far from certain and it varies widely. At excitatory synapses on cultured hippocampal neurons it ranged from 0.09 to 0.54 across terminals fed by a single axon, with most terminals low. Between layer 5 pyramidal pairs in developing rat neocortex, single spikes failed to evoke any response between 0 and 73 percent of the time. Release probability tracks the size of the readily releasable vesicle pool behind the terminal.

What is synaptic depression, and what is it for?

Synaptic depression is the fall in response strength when spikes arrive in quick succession, and it happens largely because the docked vesicle pool empties faster than it refills. Its function is gain control. Cortical neurons receive afferents firing from under 1 hertz to over 200 hertz. Modeling built on experimental measurements showed that depression lets equal percentage rate changes on fast and slow afferents produce equal postsynaptic responses. The adjustment applies to each input separately, so a quiet afferent still gets heard beside a loud one.

What is disinhibition?

Disinhibition is excitation produced by removing a brake instead of adding drive. Spontaneously active neurons are held quiet by GABAergic cells, and silencing those cells releases the target. Basal ganglia output neurons in the internal globus pallidus and substantia nigra pars reticulata fire tonically at 50 to 100 spikes per second in monkeys, and only 6 percent of them pause spontaneously. Movement begins when that standing inhibition is interrupted, which is why the basal ganglia are described as arousing motor centers by disinhibition.

What is presynaptic inhibition?

Presynaptic inhibition is the suppression of transmitter release at a terminal before anything crosses the cleft. In the spinal cord, GABAergic interneurons form axo-axonic synapses on the terminal branches of sensory fibers and produce primary afferent depolarization, which cuts release from those branches. Cable modeling with experimental verification put that depolarization near 10 millivolts on some distal branches while sparing others in the same arbor. One sensory fiber can therefore be silenced at one target and heard clearly at another.

Does posture change how spinal synapses transmit?

Posture changes it measurably. Moving from lying supine to standing lowered the soleus H-reflex from 68.7 to 54.8 percent of the maximal motor response in 10 adults. The conditioned reflex fell from 30.7 to 17.5 percent in the same subjects. That protocol reads presynaptic inhibition of the Ia pathway indirectly. Task matters as much as position. Cutaneous stimulation of the opposite foot facilitated the same reflex during standing and suppressed it during early stance of walking, with background muscle activity matched between conditions.

What does a spinal adjustment do at this level?

Studies measure it as a change in the gate on afferent terminals. A side-posture thrust at L5 to S1 attenuated the H-reflex by 28.4 percent against 15.3 percent for side-posture positioning alone, and assisted manipulation attenuated it 18.2 percent against 9.5 percent unassisted. Across 66 asymptomatic adults and 45 patients with subacute low back pain, inhibition was greatest 10 seconds after the thrust. Results are not uniform. In 75 people with knee injury and quadriceps inhibition, manual therapy moved none of these measures.

12The sources

References

1
Sabatini BL, Regehr WG. Timing of neurotransmission at fast synapses in the mammalian brain. Nature. 1996. PMID 8906792
2
Fatt P, Katz B. Spontaneous subthreshold activity at motor nerve endings. J Physiol. 1952. PMID 14946732
3
del Castillo J, Katz B. Quantal components of the end-plate potential. J Physiol. 1954. PMID 13175199
4
Schikorski T, Stevens CF. Quantitative ultrastructural analysis of hippocampal excitatory synapses. J Neurosci. 1997. PMID 9221783
5
Budisantoso T, Harada H, Kamasawa N, et al.. Evaluation of glutamate concentration transient in the synaptic cleft of the rat calyx of Held. J Physiol. 2013. PMID 23070699
6
Borst JG, Sakmann B. Calcium influx and transmitter release in a fast CNS synapse. Nature. 1996. PMID 8837774
7
Fernandez-Chacon R, Konigstorfer A, Gerber SH, et al.. Synaptotagmin I functions as a calcium regulator of release probability. Nature. 2001. PMID 11242035
8
Rosenmund C, Clements JD, Westbrook GL. Nonuniform probability of glutamate release at a hippocampal synapse. Science. 1993. PMID 7901909
9
Markram H, Lubke J, Frotscher M, Roth A, Sakmann B. Physiology and anatomy of synaptic connections between thick tufted pyramidal neurones in the developing rat neocortex. J Physiol. 1997. PMID 9147328
10
Rosenmund C, Stevens CF. Definition of the readily releasable pool of vesicles at hippocampal synapses. Neuron. 1996. PMID 8663996
11
Tsodyks MV, Markram H. The neural code between neocortical pyramidal neurons depends on neurotransmitter release probability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997. PMID 9012851
12
Abbott LF, Varela JA, Sen K, Nelson SB. Synaptic depression and cortical gain control. Science. 1997. PMID 8985017
13
Schikorski T, Stevens CF. Quantitative fine-structural analysis of olfactory cortical synapses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999. PMID 10097171
14
Elias S, Joshua M, Goldberg JA, et al.. Statistical properties of pauses of the high-frequency discharge neurons in the external segment of the globus pallidus. J Neurosci. 2007. PMID 17344390
15
Chevalier G, Deniau JM. Disinhibition as a basic process in the expression of striatal functions. Trends Neurosci. 1990. PMID 1695403
16
Rudomin P, Schmidt RF. Presynaptic inhibition in the vertebrate spinal cord revisited. Exp Brain Res. 1999. PMID 10550500
17
Lamotte d'Incamps B, Meunier C, Zytnicki D, Jami L. Flexible processing of sensory information induced by axo-axonic synapses on afferent fibers. J Physiol Paris. 1999. PMID 10574125
18
Furshpan EJ, Potter DD. Transmission at the giant motor synapses of the crayfish. J Physiol. 1959. PMID 13642302
19
Galarreta M, Hestrin S. A network of fast-spiking cells in the neocortex connected by electrical synapses. Nature. 1999. PMID 10573418
20
Deans MR, Gibson JR, Sellitto C, Connors BW, Paul DL. Synchronous activity of inhibitory networks in neocortex requires electrical synapses containing connexin36. Neuron. 2001. PMID 11516403
21
Amitai Y, Gibson JR, Beierlein M, et al.. The spatial dimensions of electrically coupled networks of interneurons in the neocortex. J Neurosci. 2002. PMID 12019332
22
Mynark RG, Koceja DM, Lewis CA. Heteronymous monosynaptic Ia facilitation from supine to standing and its relationship to the soleus H-reflex. Int J Neurosci. 1997. PMID 9522265
23
Suzuki S, Nakajima T, Mezzarane RA, et al.. Differential regulation of crossed cutaneous effects on the soleus H-reflex during standing and walking in humans. Exp Brain Res. 2014. PMID 24888533
24
Dishman JD, Dougherty PE, Burke JR. Evaluation of the effect of postural perturbation on motoneuronal activity following various methods of lumbar spinal manipulation. Spine J. 2005. PMID 16291107
25
Dishman JD, Burke JR, Dougherty P. Motor neuron excitability attenuation as a sequel to lumbosacral manipulation in subacute low back pain patients and asymptomatic adults: a cross-sectional H-reflex study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2018. PMID 29997032
26
Grindstaff TL, Pietrosimone BG, Sauer LD, et al.. Manual therapy directed at the knee or lumbopelvic region does not influence quadriceps spinal reflex excitability. Man Ther. 2014. PMID 24793076

Sources: primary literature, linked inline.

← All 61 lessons