Sports · Part Three · Injury, Rehab and Return

31KNEE

Lesson 31 / 64

The Knee

The knee is a hinge that lives or dies by its sensors, and rebuilding an athlete means rebuilding the signal, not only the structure.

The knee is the body's largest synovial joint, and its ligaments report position and load as well as restraining the bones. Just over half of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in team ball sports involve no contact with another player, and video analysis puts the whole event inside 40 milliseconds of a landing. The Unified Model of Tone reads that as a capacity event, where the knee fails because organization ran out of time.

Noncontact share of ACL injury

55 percent

Contact to tear

About 40 milliseconds

Back to preinjury level of sport

65 percent

Second ACL injury, under 25 and returned

23 percent

Noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury.

A tear with no opponent or object striking the leg. The setup is a planted foot during a cut, a single-leg landing or a hard deceleration, followed by a pop, a knee that gives way, and a joint that fills with fluid within hours.

Why the leg goes quiet afterward.

Swelling, inflammation and altered discharge from joint receptors suppress voluntary quadriceps activation through spinal reflex pathways. The muscle is intact and the athlete still cannot fully switch it on. Clinicians call it arthrogenic muscle inhibition.

01What the measurements show

The Numbers Behind a Knee That Fails

Eight findings on how a knee tears, what it loses, and what clearance actually predicts.

55 percent, no contact
Pooling 45 studies across 13 team ball sports, noncontact injuries made up 55 percent of all anterior cruciate ligament injuries, at a confidence interval of 48 to 62 percent, Chia 2022. The mechanism that dominates the sport's worst knee injury has no opponent in it.
40 milliseconds to the tear
Model-based image matching of 10 injury videos put valgus 12 degrees higher and the tibia 8 degrees more internally rotated within 40 milliseconds of initial contact, Koga 2010. Peak vertical ground reaction force averaged 3.2 times body weight and arrived in that same window. The knee was gone before a voluntary correction could begin.
1 percent of the ligament is nerve
Gold chloride staining of the human anterior cruciate ligament identified two slow-adapting Ruffini types, a rapidly adapting Pacinian corpuscle and free nerve endings, Schutte 1987. Those neural elements make up 1 percent of the area of the ligament. A restraint is also an instrument.
The graft is a thinner sensor
Immunohistochemical analysis of 29 failed grafts harvested at revision surgery identified Ruffini corpuscles and free nerve endings in each one, Rebmann 2020. Ruffini corpuscles per square centimeter ran highest in the four native control ligaments. What surgery reliably replaces is the restraint.
Both quadriceps sit below control
Across 28 studies, knee extension strength in the reconstructed limb fell below the other limb at an effect size of 0.78 and below healthy controls at 0.76, Lisee 2019. Voluntary activation in the uninjured limb also ran below controls, at 0.73. The unoperated leg is not a clean reference.
81, 65 and 55 percent
Across 69 articles and 7,556 participants, 81 percent returned to some sport after reconstruction, 65 percent to their preinjury level, and 55 percent to competitive sport, Ardern 2014. Structural repair and athletic restoration are separated by a wide margin.
23 percent tear another one
Pooling 19 studies, the second anterior cruciate ligament injury rate was 15 percent overall, 7 percent to the graft and 8 percent to the other knee, Wiggins 2016. Among athletes under 25 who returned to sport it reached 23 percent. Nearly one in four went again.
38.2 percent versus 5.6 percent
In 106 pivoting-sport patients followed two years, 38.2 percent of those who failed return-to-sport criteria suffered a knee reinjury against 5.6 percent of those who passed, Grindem 2016. The reinjury rate fell 51 percent for each month return was delayed until nine months after surgery.

02Inside the knee joint

One Percent of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Is Nerve Tissue

The knee is a sensory organ as much as a mechanical one, and that is the fact most rehab forgets. Femur, tibia and patella meet there under loads that peaked at more than three times body weight in the landings that tore a ligament on video Koga 2010.

Four ligaments hold the line. The anterior and posterior cruciates control front to back translation and rotational stability. The medial and lateral collaterals resist side to side stress. Those are the restraints an examiner tests and a surgeon repairs, and they are the half of the knee that gets discussed.

The ligaments are wired

Woven through those ligaments and the joint capsule is a population of mechanoreceptors. A gold chloride stain of the human anterior cruciate ligament identified two slow-adapting Ruffini types, a rapidly adapting Pacinian corpuscle, and free nerve endings Schutte 1987. Together those neural elements occupy 1 percent of the area of the ligament.

A review of articular tissues places a Ruffini-like receptor in the capsule, a Golgi tendon organ inside the ligament, and an encapsulated Pacinian-like corpuscle among them Zimny 1988. In the anterior cruciate ligament, most of those receptors sit in the distal portion. In the meniscus, nerves penetrate the outer and middle thirds and both horns, concentrating at the horns.

Where the receptors cluster tells you what they are for. Density runs highest in the regions related to the extremes of movement, which the review calls the first line of defense in sensing those extremes. That afferent output alerts the nervous system to an impending injury, so a reflex can avert it before the tissue reaches its limit.

When a ligament tears, the athlete loses a restraint and a sensor array in the same instant, and the brain goes partially blind to where that knee is in space. Proprioception and Joint Position Sense covers joint position sense error in degrees and the receptor classes that produce it, and the Clinical Biomechanics lesson carries the ground reaction force figures across sports.

03Why the ACL goes

Just Over Half of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries Involve No Contact at All

The anterior cruciate ligament is the knee ligament that ends seasons, and most of those tears happen with nobody touching the athlete. A meta-analysis of 45 cohort studies places the noncontact share at 55 percent, with a confidence interval of 48 to 62 percent Chia 2022.

The same analysis put noncontact incidence at 0.07 per 1000 player-hours overall. In competition it reached 0.48 and in training 0.04, because training accounts for most of the exposure hours. The proportion also runs higher in female athletes than in male athletes, and The Female Athlete carries those figures.

The whole event fits inside 40 milliseconds

Video analysis is the only way to get biomechanics out of a real tear, and it delivers the mechanism with unusual precision. Ten injury sequences from women's handball and basketball were reconstructed using model-based image matching Koga 2010. The authors call the kinematic patterns across the 10 cases surprisingly consistent.

At initial contact the knee was flexed a mean 23 degrees, valgus was neutral, and the tibia sat 5 degrees externally rotated. Within the next 40 milliseconds flexion increased by 24 degrees, valgus increased by 12 degrees, and the tibia rotated internally by 8 degrees. External rotation of 17 degrees followed, probably after the ligament had already gone.

Peak vertical ground reaction force averaged 3.2 times body weight and arrived at that same 40 millisecond mark. Every player showed immediate valgus motion inside the window, with internal tibial rotation coupled to it. The authors conclude that valgus loading contributes to the mechanism.

Forty milliseconds is the number to hold onto. No voluntary reaction can be organized in that time. The tear happens in the split second a cut, a landing or a deceleration outruns the nervous system.

The setup repeats across sports. A planted foot, a valgus collapse, and internal rotation of the tibia during a cut, a single-leg landing, or a hard deceleration. Soccer players, basketball players and alpine skiers all meet those three demands.

The tear rarely travels alone

The anterior cruciate ligament often tears alongside the medial collateral ligament and the medial meniscus, the cluster long known as the unhappy triad. The medial meniscus is the more commonly torn of the two cartilage cushions, because it is tethered to the medial collateral ligament and moves less freely under shear.

Reviewing the meniscal status of 176 consecutive patients at reconstruction, the commonest lesion was a single longitudinal vertical split of the medial meniscus Keene 1993. Medial meniscal tears rose significantly as the injury became more chronic, while the lateral rate stayed relatively constant.

The window for repair closed alongside it. Acutely, 80 percent of medial meniscal tears were repaired rather than resected, and by the chronic stage that had fallen to 46 percent. An unstable knee keeps loading a cushion that has lost its restraint, and the tear it produces gets harder to fix. How Sports Injuries Happen carries the contact and noncontact taxonomy across every mechanism in sport.

04The front of the knee

Patellofemoral Pain Is Common, and the Q Angle Does Not Predict It

Anterior knee pain is the most common knee complaint an athlete carries into a clinic, and the prospective evidence has dismantled the standard explanation for it. Annual prevalence of patellofemoral pain runs at 22.7 percent in the general population and 28.9 percent in adolescents Smith 2018.

Incidence carries the same weight. Adolescent amateur athletes developed it at 5.1 to 14.9 percent across a single season, and pooled point prevalence in adolescents came to 7.2 percent. One study put point prevalence in a military population at 13.5 percent.

The Q angle does not predict who gets it

The patella rides in the femoral groove like a cable over a pulley, steered by the quadriceps above and the patellar tendon below. The angle of that pull is measured as the Q angle. For decades a wide Q angle was the standard account of a patella tracking laterally and grinding the surfaces behind it.

Prospective data do not support it. Across 18 studies and 4,818 participants, 483 developed patellofemoral pain Neal 2019. Strong to moderate evidence showed that age, height, weight, body mass index, body fat and the Q angle were not risk factors for future pain.

Two findings did predict it. Quadriceps weakness raised risk in military recruits, most clearly when strength was normalized to body mass index, at a standardized mean difference of 0.69. Hip weakness predicted nothing in any pooled comparison.

In adolescents the hip result ran the other way. Greater hip abduction strength predicted future patellofemoral pain, at a standardized mean difference of 0.71. No single structural explanation produces a risk factor that reverses direction between two populations.

The front of the knee is steered from above

The extensor mechanism can also fail outright. The patella, the quadriceps tendon and the patellar tendon are its three points of rupture. The front of the knee works as a force transmission system, and it is steered by motor control upstream at the hip and the trunk.

That upstream claim has been tested directly, and the result is smaller than it usually gets reported. Forty-two volunteers were randomized to lumbopelvic manipulation, one minute of lumbar passive range of motion, or three minutes of prone extension on elbows Grindstaff 2009. Only the manipulation group improved, gaining 3 percent in quadriceps force and 5 percent in activation immediately afterward.

The effect was gone by 20 minutes. All three groups lost force output across the hour of testing, with no change in activation. The authors note that these participants had no knee joint pathology, so they may have had little room for activation to move.

That is a small input landing on a system with nothing to correct. The trial establishes reach: the quadriceps answers to a segment away from the knee, at a size measured in single percentage points and minutes. Tendon Pain carries the tendon literature behind anterior knee pain, and Findings in People Without Pain carries how often imaging finds joint changes in people who have no symptoms.

05What an injury steals

Surgery Restores the Restraint and Hands Back a Thinner Sensor

A torn ligament leaves a sensory hole that surgery alone does not fill. The first histological examination of human anterior cruciate ligament transplants studied 29 failed grafts taken at revision surgery, against four native ligaments after fresh rupture Rebmann 2020. Two receptor types appeared in every graft, Ruffini corpuscles and free nerve endings.

Ruffini corpuscles per square centimeter ran highest in the native control ligaments. Among the grafts, semitendinosus autografts carried the most and allografts the fewest. A partial rise in receptor counts with time since reconstruction reads, to the authors, as evidence that grafts do get reinnervated.

A reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament restores the mechanical restraint, and the graft is still not the original ligament. It does not carry the same receptor density, so the proprioceptive map of that knee stays degraded long after the joint looks stable on imaging.

Why the quadriceps will not switch on

The sensory loss has a motor consequence, and it has a name. Arthrogenic muscle inhibition is the long-lasting inability to fully activate the quadriceps after knee injury, arthritis or surgery, driven by a change in the discharge of articular sensory receptors Rice 2010. Swelling, inflammation, joint laxity and damage to joint afferents all feed it.

The pathways are identified. The group I nonreciprocal inhibitory pathway, the flexion reflex and the gamma loop all contribute at the spinal level, with preliminary evidence for supraspinal involvement. Severity tracks the degree of joint damage, the time since injury and the angle the knee is held at.

That is a regulatory decision. The quadriceps is intact and the athlete cannot fully recruit it, because the joint feeding the loop is sending a different report than it used to send.

The deficit outlasts the rehabilitation

Pooling 28 studies, knee extension strength in the reconstructed limb sat below the other limb at an effect size of 0.78, and below healthy controls at 0.76 Lisee 2019. Voluntary activation, measured as the central activation ratio, ran below controls in the reconstructed limb at an effect size of 0.84.

The uninjured leg had moved as well. Its central activation ratio also sat below healthy control limbs, at an effect size of 0.73, while its raw strength did not differ. Both deficits persist years after surgery.

This is why athletes cleared by structural tests still say the leg is not theirs, and why reinjury risk stays elevated when rehabilitation stops at strength. A knee that passes on a dynamometer can still be under-recruited on a cut.

Rebuilding the joint position sense of a knee

Restoring the knee means restoring its signal. The nervous system rebuilds joint position sense through graded balance work, single-leg stance on unstable surfaces, hop and hold drills, and multiplanar control. That work is aimed at a graft carrying fewer Ruffini corpuscles per square centimeter than the ligament it replaced Rebmann 2020.

Input that changes how the joint and the spine move changes the afferent report reaching the brain. A knee that senses itself accurately carries the readiness and protective tone demanded by a load the athlete never sees coming. That is a statement about how the joint is regulated, and the size of any single input on it is a measurement question.

Lower-Extremity Rehab carries the criteria-based progression that stages this work, and Asymmetry and the Dominant Side holds the side-to-side measures used to track it.

06Clearing the knee

Fifty-Five Percent Return to Competitive Sport After a Knee Reconstruction

Return to sport is a neurological decision before it is a calendar one. Across 69 articles and 7,556 participants, 81 percent returned to some sport after reconstruction, 65 percent to their preinjury level, and 55 percent to competitive sport Ardern 2014.

The factors separating those groups were not all surgical. Younger age, male sex, playing elite sport and a positive psychological response all favored a return to the preinjury level. Symmetrical hopping performance did as well, at an effect size of 0.3.

That last one carries a warning inside it. A limb symmetry index at or above 90 percent is the usual gate, and it is a gate rather than a finish line. Measured against the other leg, the index flagged second injuries at a sensitivity of 0.273, while comparison against the athlete's own preinjury capacity reached 0.818. Asymmetry and the Dominant Side owns that critique in full.

What clearance criteria actually predict

Passing the criteria and failing them produced very different two-year outcomes. One prospective cohort followed 106 patients in pivoting sports, recording sports participation and knee reinjury monthly Grindem 2016. Passing meant scoring above 90 on quadriceps strength symmetry, hop test symmetry, a knee outcome survey and a global rating of function.

Among the athletes who failed those criteria, 38.2 percent suffered a knee reinjury. Among those who passed, 5.6 percent did. Returning to level I sport raised the reinjury rate 4.32-fold, and more symmetrical quadriceps strength before return significantly lowered it.

Timing carried its own weight. The reinjury rate fell 51 percent for each month return was delayed until nine months after surgery, with no further reduction past that point. Those are findings from one cohort, and no athlete can be handed them as a schedule.

What the second-injury numbers look like

Reinjury is common enough to be the planning assumption. Pooling 19 studies, the second anterior cruciate ligament injury rate reached 15 percent overall, split as 7 percent to the graft and 8 percent to the opposite knee Wiggins 2016.

Among patients under 25 the rate was 21 percent, among those who returned to sport 20 percent, and among athletes who were both it reached 23 percent. The authors put that at 30 to 40 times the risk carried by uninjured adolescents.

The opposite knee took more of those second injuries than the graft did. An athlete who does not trust the repaired knee will unload it and load the other one, which is why psychological readiness belongs in the criteria alongside strength.

The fuller standard

Beyond raw symmetry, the knee has to demonstrate dynamic neuromuscular control through multiplanar movement, change of direction and plyometric loading, without pain, swelling or hesitation. The fuller standard layers in soft tissue integrity, balanced joint kinematics, neurosensory modulation and psychological readiness.

Prevention runs on the same engine. Year-round programs fold strength, plyometrics and balance for the hip, knee and foot line into warmups. They train the same neuromuscular control that fails in the instant of injury. Injury Prevention and Load Management carries what those trials found, and Return to Play holds the decision frameworks that surround a clearance date.

07What we corrected

Five Claims Corrected or Removed From This Page

This page previously put the noncontact share of anterior cruciate ligament tears at roughly seventy percent. The pooled figure across 45 studies and 13 team ball sports is 55 percent, at a confidence interval of 48 to 62 percent Chia 2022. The claim holds and the number was too high.

It also taught the Q angle as the governing cause of patellofemoral pain, with a laterally tracking patella following an underfiring vastus medialis or an inwardly rotating hip. Prospective data place the Q angle among the variables that do not predict future pain, and hip weakness among them as well Neal 2019.

A statement that quadriceps tendon rupture becomes more common past age 40 could not be traced to a source, so it is gone. The three rupture sites in the extensor mechanism stay.

The claim that year-round prevention programs lower noncontact knee injury risk now sits with Injury Prevention and Load Management, which carries those trials and their limits.

A quotation attributed to Dr. Jason Dulberg also sat on the page. It was not drawn from anything he said or wrote, so it has been taken down. What replaces it is the sourced record above.

08The model's claim

The Knee Fails Where Organization Runs Out of Time

Two layers run through this page and they should not be confused. The established science is the noncontact proportion, the video kinematics, the receptor histology of the ligament and its grafts, the arthrogenic inhibition literature, and the return and reinjury cohorts. Those literatures belong to the investigators who built them.

The Unified Model of Tone reads the knee as a capacity problem. The manuscript describes the nervous system as "a processor with a fixed capacity, taking in everything the body and the world hand it", integrating all of it in real time. A landing hands that processor a very large problem inside a very short window.

Applied to the knee, that changes what a noncontact tear is. The leg was never asked to resist a maximal load, and the ligament that failed had already survived heavier ones in the weight room. What arrived was a demand the system had 40 milliseconds to organize an answer to, and the answer did not assemble in time.

That is why the injury comes on a landing and a cut rather than under a heavy squat. A squat is slow, expected and internally generated. A cut answers an opponent, and the load arrives before the prediction has been updated. The knee fails where organization fails.

The prediction this page makes

Knee injury risk gets screened almost entirely as a magnitude: how much force the leg makes, how symmetrical the two sides are, how the joint aligns on a drop landing. Those are quantities. The model says the deciding variable is a rate, and specifically the speed at which the system organizes an answer to a demand it did not expect.

The measurement fits inside a testing session a program already runs. Record joint position sense error in degrees at the knee, reaction time variability on a choice task, and hamstring reflex latency to a sudden perturbation of the stance limb. Add RMSSD as a resting index of autonomic state, taken in the same athletes on the same morning.

The model predicts that this set separates the athletes who go on to tear a ligament better than the strength and symmetry battery does. It predicts that because all four are readings of one underlying organization. This is a claim about how a knee is regulated rather than a claim about what treatment does.

If joint position sense error, reaction time variability, hamstring reflex latency to a sudden perturbation, and RMSSD are shown to move together within the same athletes across a season, the unification claim is confirmed.

09The tone reading

Load, Input Quality and Time Course Inside a Torn Knee

Three signatures of tone appear in the way a knee fails, each inside a measurement sports medicine already records.

Load

The landing delivered more than three times body weight and finished the ligament 40 milliseconds after contact. The demand was a rate as much as a size.

Input quality

Ruffini corpuscle density ran highest in the native ligament and lower in every graft. Surgery restores the restraint and hands back a thinner report.

Time course

The reinjury rate fell 51 percent for each month return was delayed until nine months. The knee keeps its own clock.

The rest of the library carries the same logic through its other foundations. Prediction is the feedforward model an athlete runs before the foot lands, and the cut that tears a knee is the one answering an opponent rather than a plan. Gain is what arthrogenic muscle inhibition turns down, leaving an intact quadriceps the athlete cannot fully recruit. Coupling is the link between valgus and internal tibial rotation, which moved together inside the same 40 milliseconds in every injury video. Constraint is the knee held rigid to feel safe, buying stability by spending the transitions a landing needs. Set point is the 90 percent symmetry mark that clearance defends, a value settled by convention. Oscillation is the rhythm underneath a stride, and a single hop score samples it once. The full framework is set out in the Unified Model of Tone.

10Where this sits

How This Page Relates to the Rest of the Library

Seven places this argument continues, each with the claim that earns the link.

Asymmetry and the Dominant Side

Owns the limb symmetry index critique, including the finding that the index flagged second knee injuries at a sensitivity of 0.273 while the preinjury comparison reached 0.818.

Lower-Extremity Rehab

Carries the hop-test batteries and the criteria-based progression that a knee moves through before any clearance decision is made.

Return to Play

Owns the decision frameworks and treats time to return to baseline as the criterion, which is what the nine-month finding on this page is measuring.

Lower-Extremity Screening

Carries the Ottawa knee rules and the lower-extremity special tests used on a knee that has just given way and filled with fluid.

The Female Athlete

Owns the sex difference in noncontact anterior cruciate ligament rate, which runs through both the proportion and the incidence figures quoted here.

Proprioception and Joint Position Sense

Owns joint position sense error in degrees, the measurement that reads the sensory half of a knee a strength test calls recovered.

How Sports Injuries Happen

Carries the capacity-event framing across every mechanism in sport, of which the noncontact knee tear is the sharpest single case.

11Questions athletes ask

Questions Athletes Ask

Why do most anterior cruciate ligament tears happen without contact?

Because the failure is a timing problem rather than a strength problem. Across 45 studies in 13 team ball sports, noncontact injuries made up 55 percent of all anterior cruciate ligament tears. Video analysis of real injuries shows valgus rising 12 degrees and the tibia rotating internally 8 degrees within 40 milliseconds of foot contact. Ground reaction force peaked at 3.2 times body weight in that same window. No voluntary correction can be organized that fast, so the knee goes before the athlete can answer.

How fast does an anterior cruciate ligament tear actually happen?

About 40 milliseconds. Model-based image matching of 10 injury sequences from women's handball and basketball timed the whole event. At foot contact the knee sat at 23 degrees of flexion with neutral valgus. Within 40 milliseconds flexion had increased 24 degrees, valgus 12 degrees, and the tibia had rotated internally 8 degrees. Every player in the series showed that immediate valgus motion. Nothing an athlete decides can be delivered inside that window, which is why landing and cutting technique is trained in advance and never improvised.

What does it take to be cleared to return to sport after a knee injury?

Return is a neurological decision before a calendar one. A limb symmetry index at or above 90 percent is the baseline gate rather than the finish line, because it can be met by the healthy side declining. Beyond it, the knee must show dynamic neuromuscular control through change of direction and plyometric loading, without pain, swelling or hesitation. The fuller standard layers in soft tissue integrity, balanced joint kinematics, neurosensory modulation and psychological readiness. In one cohort, 38.2 percent of athletes who failed the criteria reinjured, against 5.6 percent who passed.

How do you actually restore proprioception in a knee after reconstruction?

By training the receptors that report position alongside the muscle that moves the joint. Human graft histology finds Ruffini corpuscles and free nerve endings, at densities below the native ligament, so the report from that joint stays thinner after surgery. Joint position sense is rebuilt through graded balance work, single-leg stance on unstable surfaces, hop and hold drills, and multiplanar control. A board-certified chiropractic neurologist measures joint position sense error, reaction time, balance and eye movements on each side separately. Care is drug free and fully anti-doping compliant.

What are the odds of tearing the graft or the other knee?

Pooled across 19 studies, the second anterior cruciate ligament injury rate was 15 percent overall, split as 7 percent to the graft and 8 percent to the opposite knee. Among patients under 25 it reached 21 percent, among those who returned to sport 20 percent, and among athletes who were both, 23 percent. The authors put that at 30 to 40 times the risk carried by uninjured adolescents. In a separate cohort the reinjury rate fell 51 percent for each month return was delayed until nine months.

Is patellofemoral pain caused by my Q angle or a weak vastus medialis?

Prospective evidence says no. Across 18 studies and 4,818 participants, 483 developed patellofemoral pain. Strong to moderate evidence placed age, height, weight, body mass index, body fat and the Q angle among the variables that do not predict it. Hip weakness did not predict it either. What did predict was quadriceps weakness in military recruits, and in adolescents the reverse of the usual advice: greater hip abduction strength raised risk. Patellofemoral pain is common, with annual prevalence at 22.7 percent in the general population.

How does the Unified Model of Tone read a knee injury?

As a capacity event. The model treats the nervous system as a processor with a fixed capacity, integrating everything the body and the world hand it in real time. A cut or a landing hands it a very large problem inside 40 milliseconds, and a noncontact tear is what happens when the demand exceeds what the system can organize in that window. That reframing makes a testable prediction: joint position sense error, reaction time variability, reflex latency and RMSSD should track injury better than a strength and symmetry battery.

12The sources

References

1
Koga H, Nakamae A, Shima Y, Iwasa J, Myklebust G, Engebretsen L, Bahr R, Krosshaug T. Mechanisms for noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries: knee joint kinematics in 10 injury situations from female team handball and basketball. Am J Sports Med. 2010. PMID 20595545
2
Chia L, De Oliveira Silva D, Whalan M, McKay MJ, Sullivan J, Fuller CW, Pappas E. Non-contact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Epidemiology in Team-Ball Sports: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis by Sex, Age, Sport, Participation Level, and Exposure Type. Sports Med. 2022. PMID 35622227
3
Schutte MJ, Dabezies EJ, Zimny ML, Happel LT. Neural anatomy of the human anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987. PMID 3805085
4
Zimny ML. Mechanoreceptors in articular tissues. Am J Anat. 1988. PMID 3291597
5
Rebmann D, Mayr HO, Schmal H, Hernandez Latorre S, Bernstein A. Immunohistochemical analysis of sensory corpuscles in human transplants of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020. PMID 32680550
6
Rice DA, McNair PJ. Quadriceps arthrogenic muscle inhibition: neural mechanisms and treatment perspectives. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2010. PMID 19954822
7
Lisee C, Lepley AS, Birchmeier T, O'Hagan K, Kuenze C. Quadriceps Strength and Volitional Activation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sports Health. 2019. PMID 30638441
8
Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, Webster KE. Fifty-five per cent return to competitive sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis including aspects of physical functioning and contextual factors. Br J Sports Med. 2014. PMID 25157180
9
Wiggins AJ, Grandhi RK, Schneider DK, Stanfield D, Webster KE, Myer GD. Risk of Secondary Injury in Younger Athletes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2016. PMID 26772611
10
Grindem H, Snyder-Mackler L, Moksnes H, Engebretsen L, Risberg MA. Simple decision rules can reduce reinjury risk by 84% after ACL reconstruction: the Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study. Br J Sports Med. 2016. PMID 27162233
11
Smith BE, Selfe J, Thacker D, Hendrick P, Bateman M, Moffatt F, Rathleff MS, Smith TO, Logan P. Incidence and prevalence of patellofemoral pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018. PMID 29324820
12
Neal BS, Lack SD, Lankhorst NE, Raye A, Morrissey D, van Middelkoop M. Risk factors for patellofemoral pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2019. PMID 30242107
13
Keene GC, Bickerstaff D, Rae PJ, Paterson RS. The natural history of meniscal tears in anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Am J Sports Med. 1993. PMID 8238706
14
Grindstaff TL, Hertel J, Beazell JR, Magrum EM, Ingersoll CD. Effects of lumbopelvic joint manipulation on quadriceps activation and strength in healthy individuals. Man Ther. 2009. PMID 18805726

14 primary sources, each linked to its record. Figures quoted on this page were checked against the published abstract.

Related evidence

← All 64 lessons