Our Approach · The Legends · Era V
Era V · Carol Stream, Illinois
Sue Brown
The Tonalist
Sue Brown, D.C., created Bio-Geometric Integration. She graduated from Palmer College of Chiropractic in 1987, practiced Network Chiropractic alongside Donald Epstein, then left to build a method of her own and first taught BGI in 2000. Her contribution is a map. Tension from an experience the body could not finish processing travels along traceable tracks through muscle, ligament and bone, so the contact goes where the tension actually sits. The Unified Model of Tone reads those tracks as the shape a distortion of tone takes in tissue.

Trained
Palmer College of Chiropractic, D.C. 1987
Died
June 7, 2015 · Carol Stream, Illinois
Practiced
Carol Stream, Illinois, from April 1988
Founded
Bio-Geometric Integration · First taught 2000
Honored
Legion of Chiropractic Philosophers
01 / THE OCEAN FIRST
Sue Brown trained as an oceanographer before she trained as a chiropractor
Brown worked as an oceanographer before she worked on a spine, studying how the planet loads force along its structures and releases it in seismic events. That training set the question she asked of a body for the rest of her career. A structure under load stores that load somewhere. It releases according to the geometry of the structure rather than at the point of impact. Every distinctive feature of Bio-Geometric Integration follows from taking that sentence literally about a human being.
Palmer College in 1987, and a practice opened in April 1988
She built that practice into Essence Quality of Life Center, a multidisciplinary clinic in Carol Stream, Illinois, in the western suburbs of Chicago. Sue Brown had graduated from Palmer College of Chiropractic in 1987 and opened the practice in April 1988. Her own account dates the development of BGI to that office. The concepts were worked out on patients between 1988 and 2000, and the course manuals carry a 1998 copyright with a 2013 revision.
The question Brown set out to answer
Brown opened the BGI I manual with the problem that started the work. Chiropractic holds dozens of techniques, each born of a founder's insight, and some practitioners palpate things nobody taught them to feel. She wanted to know how those practitioners became masters and whether the route could be taught. Her manual puts the answer plainly. A formula produces a technician, and the reasoning produces a master.
02 / NETWORK, THEN HER OWN
Brown practiced Network Chiropractic alongside Donald Epstein and then left to build BGI
Brown first taught Bio-Geometric Integration formally in 2000. Before that she practiced Network Chiropractic alongside Donald Epstein, then left that work and built a method on her own terms. The order is often reported backwards. BGI shares the breath, the light contact and the patient's active role with the tonal methods Brown had worked in for years. Those elements are held in common.
BGI has no parent technique
Brown did not set out to extend anyone else's system. She described BGI as an understanding of chiropractic, the subluxation and the body, applied through palpation. Into a base of her own she folded biotensegrity, fractal geometry, systems biology, chaos theory and her seismic models of how structures load and release. She also drew on sacred geometry, which she taught as part of the framework rather than as clinical procedure. Brown taught BGI across the United States, Canada, Europe and the South Pacific.
What BGI is applied to
BGI prescribes no universal thrust, and the absence is deliberate. Brown designed it to be laid over whatever adjusting a practitioner already performed, or used as a framework independent of any named approach. The manual states the aim: a logical path for locating and adjusting a subluxation by the most efficient and least invasive route. The technique page for Bio-Geometric Integration carries the mechanism in full.
03 / POTENTIAL ENERGY
Brown redefined the subluxation as stored potential energy rather than as damage
Brown called her model the Potential Energy Theory of Subluxation, and the rest of BGI follows from it. Every experience arrives at the body as information, whether it is a fall, a chemical exposure, a grief or a belief. The body integrates that information or it stores it. Integration raises what the system can do. Storage leaves the body organized around unfinished business, and that organization is what chiropractic has always called the subluxation. On this reading the adjustment releases what the body is holding.
Where the theory was first written down
Brown set the model out twice in the formal literature. Subluxation and Human Evolution: A Philosophical Model of Subluxation went to the Legion of Chiropractic Philosophers at the Palmer College philosophy colloquium in May 2000. The Journal of Vertebral Subluxation Research published it in June 2007, at pages 1 to 7. Subluxation and Chaos Theory followed for the International Chiropractic Association Philosophy Conference in May 2004, signed from Carol Stream and carrying the letters L.C.P. after her name.
Integration switches on what was already there
Brown argued the capacity point from cell biology. Every cell carries the complete genetic information, and a liver cell differs from a heart cell by what has been activated in it rather than by what it holds. Integration on her account switches something on that was present and dormant. She illustrated resonance with two guitars set side by side. Pluck a string on one and the matching string on the other begins to sound, because it sits in the same field and is built to answer that frequency.
Brown named four channels a stored distortion interferes with
Classical chiropractic named one channel, the nervous system. Brown named four, on the argument that a definition written for the science of 1895 could not carry the science that followed it. In her framing a stored distortion shows up in four places at once. The geometry of the body alters down to the cellular level. Bones misalign, with tension carried through soft tissue and the nervous system. The body's electromagnetic field loses coherence, and its neurochemistry loses coordination. She drew the neurochemical channel from Candace Pert's work on neuropeptide receptors as a signaling network reaching across the endocrine, neurological, gastrointestinal and immune systems.
By knowing in which tissue the potential is primarily stored, we can more specifically and efficiently release the subluxation.
Sue Brown, D.C., Bio-Geometric Integration I course manual, 199804 / POINTS OF RAPPORT
Points of rapport tell the practitioner which tissue system is holding the stored potential
Brown's first clinical question is which tissue system holds the stored potential, and she named three: skeletal, muscular, and ligamentous or soft connective tissue. The answer settles three things. It names the rapport the practitioner palpates for, the force that suits it, and the place the force lands: on the bony segment, between segments, in the body of a muscle, or at a tendon. She classified first so the release would land on the stored potential itself.
Subluxation tracks run continuously, and they can be traced
Brown described stored tension as traveling in tracks, stored in layers a practitioner can palpate. A continuous pattern broadens and narrows and twists and turns, and it stays continuous along its whole length. It expresses a consistent tone and a consistent shape, whether bilateral, unilateral, midline or rotational. At several places along a track it narrows and intensifies, and Brown called those places focal points. Focal points concentrate the potential energy, and they are where she adjusted.
Rapport palpates differently in each of the three tissue systems
Muscle, ligament and bone each give the hand a different signature, and the signature names the primary tissue. Muscle puts rapport on the segment, where it palpates as a small area of ease surrounded by tension. The ligamentous system puts it between the segments, a pinpoint of ease in the intersegmental space or at a tendinous attachment. The skeletal system puts it back on the segment, palpating as pliability inside the fixation. Brown noted that the profession already knew the sensation under other names, including stickiness over a vertebra and a magnet drawing the hand.
The geometry came out of the tracks
Brown wrote in the manual that the geometric correlates were derived from the patterns found in the focal points along the subluxation tracks. She mapped six triangles and divided each into six correlate regions. The triangles are sacral, lumbar, thoracic, clavicular, cervical and cranial. Bases correlate with bases and apices with apices, so a distortion at one region should appear at the matching region in every triangle. The correlates distort alike and palpate alike, and her 2004 paper cites the BGI course manuals as the source of the correlations. Brown put a gate on the finding. Rapport must be present at every correlate point in a series, checked consistently at the same aspect. If it is missing at any point, the track has not fully surfaced and the timing is wrong.
The front of the body is subtler, and Brown gave a two-point test for it
Brown mapped the front and the sagittal plane in the second course, and she was direct about the difficulty. The anterior tracks differ from the posterior ones mainly in subtlety, because the density of the posterior musculature makes the back tracks more expressive under the hand. Her workaround is a two-point test. Place a finger on one correlate and a finger of the other hand on a second correlate in the same series, then apply alternating pressure. If the two belong to one track, the line of tension between them rises and falls, and a subtle pulling registers at both points.
The order of contacts follows the geometry
A triangle releases from its base, and the base is the first contact of a session. Brown's rule works it that way because releasing the base can free the whole triangle. If the base clears and the distortion holds, the apex comes next, which frees both ends. If the distortion still holds, the practitioner moves to the next base inward, then the next apex, and so on. That progression is what BGI calls a series.
05 / BREATH AND FORCE
Brown made the patient's own breath the source of the force in soft tissue work
Brown's rule for how much force to use has two steps and no dose chart. Match the tone of the tissue first, which she described as the natural synchronization that happens when a practitioner intends to connect. Only if the release has not occurred does force enter, and then only enough to surpass the resistance to movement of the stored energy rather than of the muscle or the bone. Brown wrote that the exact amount cannot be defined in advance, and that when it is reached the rapport disappears.
Where the tension sits decides the contact
Brown specified three deliveries, one per tissue system, and they differ in speed, in placement, and in who generates the force. Skeletal tension takes a high-speed thrust applied on the segment, externally generated. Muscular tension calls for the same external force, delivered slowly. Soft connective tissue tension takes a light contact in the intersegmental space, along a line consistent with the joint space, and the force is generated internally. Brown grounded the soft tissue contact in mechanics. An external force applied there raises tension and compression at the joint, which stiffens the release the practitioner is after.
The breath supplies what the hands should not
Once tone is matched, if a soft tissue release needs more force, Brown had the patient take a deep breath directed into the area under contact and deep enough to expand it. She treated the internally generated force as the first step toward a self-correcting system. The contact stays sustained and synchronized with the patient's own breathing. The patient supplies part of the force, which makes them a participant in the adjustment rather than a recipient of it.
Continuity comes before the adjustment
Brown built a preliminary step she called establishing continuity, and she ordered its options from least invasive to most. Time and ordinary daily activity come first, because she wanted the system to remember that everyday movement can release a pattern. Breath comes second, directed into the specific area. Change of position comes third, in order of postural change, then long lever through an extremity or rib, then short lever at a specific segment. Brown built integration pauses between contacts so the system could reorganize before the next input arrived. She also closed the loop with a post-check, asking after the adjustment whether the rapport had cleared and whether the track had cleared. A track she could still trace had not released, whatever else had changed.
06 / WHAT SHE SET ASIDE
Brown kept chiropractic's 1895 foundations and set three later additions aside
Brown accepted chiropractic's founding claim without reservation. An organizing intelligence exists. It can be interfered with, and it works toward health. She then set aside three claims that accumulated after 1895. That healing takes time. That matter has limits the innate must work within. That universal forces destroy while innate forces build. Each rejection changed the clinical model that followed from it.
The rejection that produced the potential energy model
The third rejection did the work. Brown refused the moral sorting of forces into destructive and constructive. If an organizing intelligence is perfect then its expression is perfect, and an event being uncomfortable does not make it destructive. What the profession had labeled good and bad she read as one process that is sometimes pleasant and sometimes not. Remove the idea that anything arriving at the body is inherently damaging, and the subluxation stops being damage and becomes unfinished processing. That single move is what the potential energy model is built on.
07 / BROWN AND TONE
Brown mapped where tension is stored, and the Unified Model of Tone reads that map as tone
Brown held that stored tension has an address, that the address is reachable by palpation, and that the addresses across a body stand in fixed relation to one another. That is a strong, checkable claim about how a distortion distributes, and it is what Brown added to the profession.
Stored tension follows a mappable geometry
The Unified Model of Tone holds that a distortion is never local. The body is a prestressed tension network, so a force introduced anywhere redistributes across the whole structure rather than staying where it landed. Donald Ingber established in 1997 that this architecture operates down to the cell, where prestress in the cytoskeleton carries mechanical signals and couples distant structures into one response. Brown drew the clinical consequence from the same architecture and cited Ingber in her 2004 paper. Naming one subluxated segment describes where the distortion concentrates, and the track is where it lives.
Brown's force rule states the model's correspondence claim in palpation terms
The model holds that specificity is correspondence rather than magnitude. An input works when the system registers it as information about its own state, and force beyond that degrades the message. Brown wrote the same rule with the word tone in it. Force matches tone, and it is just great enough to surpass the resistance to movement of the stored energy. Her three tissue classes are a force spectrum indexed to where the tension sits rather than to how much the patient can absorb. Input quality is the model's term for the same variable.
Brown said she was returning to Palmer's teaching on tone, and the record supports her
D.D. Palmer built the science on tone rather than on displaced bone, and Brown presented BGI as a return to that claim. He wrote in 1910 that tone is the source or origin of all life, and that tone is the normal degree of nerve tension. He defined the cause of disease as any variation of tone, nerves too tense or too slack. Brown's stored potential is a description of tone carrying history, arrived at from seismic loading instead of from anatomy.
What the Unified Model of Tone predicts from here
Two predictions follow, and they belong to the model rather than to Brown. First, the correlate claim is measurable. If a distortion at one region reliably appears at its matching region in every triangle, instrumented tissue compliance at those points should covary. Run it with three examiners who cannot see each other's findings. Second, the model predicts a bidirectional signature across a course of care. People starting with excessive tension and people starting with too little should both move toward their own midpoint, and the spread across a group should narrow. Constraint is the part of tone her tracks are reading.
08 / THE RECORD
Brown's ideas reached the profession's philosophy literature, and the community she trained carries the work
By May 2004 Brown was signing her papers L.C.P. (Hon.), the Legion of Chiropractic Philosophers designation earned with the thesis she had submitted four years earlier. She taught BGI in North America, Europe and the South Pacific from 2000 onward, and she practiced and taught until the end. Brown died at home in Carol Stream, Illinois, on June 7, 2015.
Who teaches BGI now
BGI Seminars has run the curriculum without interruption since, on a foundational sequence of BGI 1, BGI 2 and BGI 3 alongside BGI Osseous, BGI Animal and BGI Playshops. Katina Manning, Lou Corleto and Valerie Pennacchio contributed to the BGI Osseous manual with Brown. An elective runs at Life University in Marietta, Georgia. BGI Europe teaches a sequential geometry curriculum in Amsterdam, Hamburg, Paris and Venice, and BGI Australia runs the regional program.
09 / THE LEGENDS
Where Sue Brown sits among the legends
Brown belongs with the figures who moved chiropractic down the force spectrum in the 1980s and 1990s without giving up specificity. Arno Burnier arrived at the same low end by another route, delivering the adjustment into ease rather than into defense. His Mastery, Love and Service shares her position that the practitioner's own state is part of the input. Donald Epstein is the colleague she practiced beside before she left, and the two methods share the breath and the light contact without either descending from the other.
How this page relates to the rest of the library
The Bio-Geometric Integration page carries the mechanism, the four channels Brown named, and the delivery in detail. Brown's contact at the sacrotuberous ligament, taken prone with a lift toward the ceiling, sits beside Logan Basic, which reached the same ligament with a sustained contact of a few ounces from the 1930s. Tonal Chiropractic is the amalgamation this practice built from methods like hers. The full roster of figures sits at The Legends, and the variable underneath all of it is set out at tone.
COMMON QUESTIONS
Questions people ask about Sue Brown
Who was Sue Brown, D.C.?
Sue Brown was the American chiropractor who created Bio-Geometric Integration, known throughout the profession as BGI. She worked as an oceanographer before chiropractic, graduated from Palmer College of Chiropractic in 1987, and opened her practice in April 1988 in the western suburbs of Chicago. She practiced Network Chiropractic alongside Donald Epstein, then left to build her own method, and first taught BGI formally in 2000.
What did Sue Brown contribute to the understanding of tone?
Brown contributed a geometry. She held that tension from an unintegrated experience travels along continuous tracks through muscle, ligament and bone. The tracks intensify at traceable focal points, and the contact belongs at the focal point rather than at the symptom. Her force rule states the same idea from the delivery side. Force matches tone, and only enough is used to release the stored energy.
What are points of rapport in BGI?
Rapport is the palpable quality that marks where stored potential concentrates, and Brown gave it three distinct signatures. In muscle it feels like a small area of ease surrounded by tension. In ligament it feels like a pinpoint of ease between segments or at a tendinous attachment. In bone it feels like pliability within a fixation. Identifying which one is present tells the practitioner what force to use and where to place it.
Is BGI a branch of Network Chiropractic?
No. Brown practiced Network Chiropractic alongside Donald Epstein and then left that work to build BGI on its own terms. The two share the breath, the light contact and the patient's active role, which were ideas she had worked with for years. Those elements are held in common, and BGI has no parent technique in the ordinary sense. Brown first taught it formally in 2000, twelve years after she opened her own practice.
What did Sue Brown write?
Two formal papers and the BGI course manuals. Subluxation and Human Evolution: A Philosophical Model of Subluxation was submitted for the Legion of Chiropractic Philosophers in May 2000 and published in the Journal of Vertebral Subluxation Research in June 2007. Subluxation and Chaos Theory followed for the International Chiropractic Association Philosophy Conference in May 2004. The BGI I, II and III manuals carry a 1998 copyright with a 2013 revision.
Why does BGI say a subluxation is never in one place?
Because the body is a tensegrity structure. Rigid elements sit inside a continuous tension network held under standing tension even at rest, which makes the whole thing a transmission array. A force introduced anywhere spreads immediately through the entire structure. Brown's conclusion was that naming a single subluxated segment describes where the distortion concentrates, and the track describes where it actually is.
REFERENCES
Sources
- Brown SM. Subluxation and Human Evolution: A Philosophical Model of Subluxation. J Vertebral Subluxation Res, June 2007:1-7. Submitted for the Legion of Chiropractic Philosophers, Palmer College of Chiropractic Philosophy Colloquium, May 2000.
- Brown SM. Subluxation and Chaos Theory. Submitted for the International Chiropractic Association Philosophy Conference 2004. Carol Stream, Illinois, May 2004.
- Brown SM. Bio-Geometric Integration I: Force Integration and Posterior Geometry. Course manual, copyright 1998, revised 2013.
- Brown SM. Bio-Geometric Integration II: Anterior and Sagittal Geometry. Course manual, copyright 1998, revised 2013.
- Brown SM. What is Bio-Geometric Integration? Reprinted by BGI Seminars.
- Bio-Geometric Integration, BGI Seminars: curriculum, instructors and directory.
- BGI Australia. Sue Brown, D.C., founder and developer of Bio-Geometric Integration.
- Ingber DE. Tensegrity: the architectural basis of cellular mechanotransduction. Annu Rev Physiol 1997;59:575-599.
- Ingber DE. The Architecture of Life. Scientific American, January 1998. Cited by Brown in Subluxation and Chaos Theory.
- Palmer DD. The Chiropractor's Adjuster: The Science, Art and Philosophy of Chiropractic. Portland: Portland Printing House; 1910, pages 7 and 879.
- Stephenson RW. Chiropractic Text Book. Davenport: Palmer School of Chiropractic; 1927. Cited by Brown throughout both papers.
- Pert C. Molecules of Emotion. New York: Scribner; 1997. Cited by Brown for the neurochemical channel.
- Prigogine I, Stengers I. Order Out of Chaos. New York: Bantam Books; 1984. Cited by Brown for reorganization under energy input.
- Obituary of Susan M. Brown, D.C., Carol Stream, Illinois. Daily Herald, June 2015.
Education, not medical advice. Bio-Geometric Integration is taught independently of this practice, and nothing here is published on its behalf.